We have to appreciate the quality of the fabric used in the upholstery on the seat. On the orther hand, if we talk about Aura, its interior is premium and good fit and finishing. We’d say it’s a step up compared to the Vitara Brezza but it’s acceptable, not exceptional. Even the fitment quality is of a budget grade, with bits like the center console flexing/moving about when you fiddle with it. However, the plastics don’t feel as robust or thick as they do in a Sonet, Venue, XUV300 or even EcoSport. If we talk about its interior, the finish quality of the plastics is smooth and the grey fabric on the door pads is a thoughtful touch. If we talk about Nissan Magnite, it gets a pretty decent build quality. We can't give any verdict about their structural strength as both cars haven't been tested by NCAP yet. Aura or Magnite, whose build quality is better? Turbochargers enable smaller, more efficient engines to compete with the power and torque ratings of much larger engines Naturally-aspirated internal combustion engines simply lack the bolt on. Certain variants also get the option of a CVT, however, the torque figure in that case drops down to 152Nm. This engine too is available with a 5-speed manual transmission. The second and more powerful option is a 1.0-litre turbo-petrol engine that makes 100PS/160Nm. The Magnite is offered with two petrol engines. It delivers 20.0 kmpl and 17.7 kmpl mileage with its manual and CVT variants respectively. It churns out 100PS and 160Nm (152Nm with the CVT gearbox). On the other hand, new 1.0-litre turbo-petrol unit can be had with either a 5-speed MT or CVT. It delivers a claimed mileage of 18.75 kmpl. Its 1.0-litre naturally aspirated petrol engine makes 72PSpower and 96Nm torque and mated to a 5-speed MT gearbox. What's the difference between normal engine and turbo engine of Magnite?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |